An Integrated Approach for Nitrogen Management In Upland Cotton Across The U.S. Cotton Belt

Crops: Cotton
4R Practices: Source Rate Time Place

An Integrated Approach for Nitrogen Management In Upland Cotton Across The U.S. Cotton Belt

Lead Researcher:

Dr. William Frame

Associate Professor

Virginia Tech

Start Date: 2019

End Date: 2023

Collaborating scientists and universities

  • Dr. Katie Lewis, Texas A&M University
  • Dr. Tyson Raper, University of Tennessee
  • Dr. Glendon Harris, University of Georgia
  • Dr. Ryan Stewart, Virginia Tech University

Matching Funds

  • USDA-NRCS
  • Koch Agronomic Services, LLC
  • Virginia Cotton Board

Project Summary

Nitrogen (N) is second only to water as a yield-limiting factor in non-legume cropping systems such as corn (Zea mays L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Countless research endeavors have sought to unravel the dominant loss mechanisms/pathways in these two crops; however, the end result is that N use efficiency (NUE) remains ~33% worldwide and 40-60% in the U.S. As a result, roughly half to two-thirds of the applied N in non-legume cropping systems can move off-target and into the surrounding environment. To reduce these gaps in NUE, integrated research is needed to understand how N moves, transforms, and is utilized in non-legume cropping systems. This need is particularly urgent in cotton production systems, which represent 5.67 million hectares in the U.S. and required 373,409 metric tons of applied N in 2017.

Previous studies in cotton have focused on N application rates, timing, source, and placement (the 4R’s of nutrient management) in the Mid-South, Southeast, and Texas (High plains/Coastal Bend) regions of the U.S. In contrast, few studies have evaluated 4R’s of N management across the humid portions of the cotton belt, even though these areas represent 89.5% of production. At the same time, new/improved technologies and management strategies such as improved cotton varieties, enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEF’s), and integrated cover crop solutions offer the potential to regulate N transformations in the soil and reduce N losses to surrounding ecosystems. Still, the ability of these techniques to improve NUE in contemporary cotton systems has not been rigorously examined. This project seeks to fill this important knowledge gap by integrating the 4R’s within a comprehensive agroecosystem perspective to improve NUE in cotton cropping systems, while also enhancing soil chemical and physical properties and decreasing off-target N movement via leaching and volatilization.

Project Goals:

  • Quantify the agronomic response of contemporary cotton varieties adapted to major production regions to varying N rates and placement strategies.
  • Determine the impact of EEF’s on N transformations and increasing NUE in cotton production systems.
  • Measure gaseous N losses, other common greenhouse gases from common N fertilizers, and leaching of N applied at varying N application rates and placements with and without enhanced efficiency N fertilizer additives or products.
  • Quantify the effectiveness of current N stabilizers and slow/controlled release N products on N transformations/species in representative soil types from the U.S. Cotton Belt in control laboratory environments.
  • Measure the impact of various cover crops and cropping rotations on N cycling and availability in different regional production systems and evaluate the responsiveness of cotton to applied N at those locations.
  • Develop a comprehensive management guide that informs regional management practices, thus reducing off target movement of N and maximizing the NUE of cotton systems.

Project Results:

  • No preliminary result

Annual Reports

Determine Benefits of 4R Nutrient Management and Conservation Practices On Water Quality and Use Efficiency via the Arkansas Discovery Farm Program: A Collective Learning Experience

Crops: Cotton Rice
4R Practices: Source Rate Time Place

Lead Researcher:

Dr. Andrew Sharpley

Distinguished Professor of Soils and Water Quality

University of Arkansas

Start Date: 2019

End Date: 2023

Collaborating scientists and universities

  • Dr. Mike Daniels, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas
  • Dr. Karl VanDevender, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas
  • Dr. Bill Robertson, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas
  • Dr. Nathan Slaton, Director Soil Testing Laboratory, University of Arkansas
  • Dr. Trenton Roberts, Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas
  • Larry Berry, Discovery Farms Field Manager, University of Arkansas

Project Summary

Agriculture is the single largest economic sector in Arkansas, accounting for $21.4 billion of value added to the State’s economy in 2016 (University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, 2019). Arkansas is the nation’s leading rice producer, second in poultry production and in the top 15 among states for cotton, soybean, and corn. Agricultural enterprise account for about 98% of the 1.1 million tons of fertilizer sold annually in Arkansas.

Nutrient enrichment remains a major impairment to the designated uses of fresh and coastal waters of the United States. While there are many sources of nutrients, the contribution of agriculture has received increased attention to reduce nutrient losses, fueled by recent modeling efforts and surveys, which suggest agriculture contributes up to 85% of the nutrients entering the Gulf of Mexico. However, there have been few farm-scale studies of the effects of nutrient management and conservation practice (CP) adoption on water use-efficiency, quality, and system sustainability under cotton and rice production in the Basin, particularly the Lower Mississippi River Basin. These concerns are manifested from regional issues such as hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico and critical groundwater decline in lower Mississippi Alluvial Aquifer. Also, the cotton supply chain from field to gin, to mill, to retailer, wants assurances that cotton production is sustainable for future business interests. This has prompted supply chain groups such as Field to Market and the Cotton Leeds program, to measure and document indicators of sustainability. Several AR cotton producers are working with the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture to use the Field Print Calculator for individual fields in AR. The Field to Market Field Print Calculator now includes metrics for rice and is being used by groups, such as the USA Rice Federation, to encourage producers to move towards more sustainable practices.

Project Goals:

  • This project will leverage and modify existing ADF monitoring to determine water quality and use benefits of 4R nutrient stewardship on three ADFs.
  • Collect and compile farm-nutrient management information and data for N, P, and K, along with other soil properties influencing soil fertility, such as pH, CEC, particle-size distribution, organic C, and the suite of Mehlich-3 extractable soil nutrients.
  • Collect soil and water samples, analyze, interpret, verify, and document nutrient and sediment loss reduction and water conservation.
  • Determine if the Field Print Calculator reliably expresses 4R effects plus conservation practices (CPs) on nutrient runoff potential.
  • Deliver an outreach and farmer – collective learning program that disseminates information to all stakeholders.

Stacking and Intersecting Nutrient And Irrigation 4Rs

Crops: Alfalfa Apples Barley Beans (dry) Canola Hops Potato Tart cherry Winter wheat Wheat
4R Practices: Source Rate Time Place

Stacking and Intersecting Nutrient And Irrigation 4Rs

Lead Researcher:

Dr. Matt Yost

Assistant Professor

Utah State University

Start Date: 2019

End Date: 2024

Collaborating scientists and universities

  • Dr. Neil Hanson, Brigham Young University
  • Dr. Grant Cardon, Utah State University
  • Dr. Bryan Hopkins, Brigham Young University
  • Dr. Olga Walsh, University of Idaho
  • Dr. Jared Williams, Brigham Young University-Idaho
  • Dr. Howard Neibling, Bringham Young University-Idaho
  • Dr. Brent Black, Utah State University

Matching Funds

  • Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research
  • USDA-SARE

Project Summary

This project will explore how individual and stacked nutrient and irrigation 4R’s intersect to improve the sustainability of major forage, fruit, grain, and vegetable crops in the West. It will address both priority cropping systems and priority issues outlined in the request for proposals. Four major efforts will include producer surveys to quantify 4R adoption and barriers, five coordinated field experiments that will utilize a new innovative way to evaluate stacking nutrient 4R’s across crops, utilization of three existing stacked irrigation 4R experiments to quantify how 90 water conservation treatments influence nutrient uptake and efficiencies, and a dynamic multi-state coordinated outreach program to improve adoption of nutrient and irrigation 4R’s. Intersecting nutrient and irrigation 4R’s will guide investments by growers and industry towards combinations that result in the most profitable and sustainable outcomes

Project Goals:

  • Determine western forage, fruit, grain, and vegetable producer’s attitudes, acceptance rates, and barriers to adoption of nutrient and irrigation 4R’s in order to better adapt and target Extension and outreach efforts.
  • Identify how individual and stacked nitrogen fertilizer 4R’s impact crop performance, water productivity, and environmental impacts.
  • Expand FFAR trials to determine how individual and stacked irrigation 4R’s impact nutrient uptake and use efficiency.
  • Deliver dynamic educational products and training on nutrient and irrigation 4R’s through Extension and coordinated outreach.

Project Results:

  • No preliminary results

Annual Reports

Keep Fertilizer on the Farm: Using the 4R Framework to Support Sustainable Nutrient Management in the Northern Great Plains

Crops: Corn for grain Corn for silage
4R Practices: Source Rate Time Place

Lead Researcher:

Dr. Lindsay Pease

Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist in Nutrient and Water Management

University of Minnesota

Start Date: 2020

End Date: 2024

Collaborating scientists and universities

  • Dr. Amitava Chatterjee, North Dakota State University
  • Dr. Jeppe Kjaersgaard, Minnesota Department of Agriculture
  • Dr. David Lobb, University of Manitoba
  • Dr. Stephen Crittenden, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  • Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy
  • Warren Formo, Minnesota Agricultural Water Resources Center
  • Dr. Merrin Macrae, University of Waterloo
  • Dr. Heidi Peterson, Sand County Foundation
  • Dr. Mitchell Timmerman, Manitoba Agriculture
  • Dr. Henry Wilson, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Matching Funds

  • Minnesota Rapid Agricultural Response Fund
  • Environment Climate Change Canada
  • Minnesota Wheat Research & Promotion Council
  • Minnesota Corn Research & Promotion Council
  • Minnesota Agricultural Fertilizer Research and Education Council
  • Red River Watershed Management Board
  • University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural, and Natural Resource Sciences
  • Minnesota Agricultural Water Resources Center
  • Minnesota Department of Agriculture Clean Water Fund

Project Summary

Increased grain production in the Northern Great Plains is shifting the traditional range of the North American Corn Belt. At the same time, eutrophication of freshwater lakes is emerging as a critical threat to aquatic ecosystems worldwide. The Red River Basin of the North is currently adapting to new demands in response to both of these changes. Defining and adopting 4R Nutrient Stewardship and edge-of-field (EOF) practices for this cold weather climate across the Red River Basin is critical to reducing the extent and severity of nutrient runoff losses from agricultural land to Lake Winnipeg. Motivating producers to change crop production and nutrient management practices based on environmental impact is difficult in this region since an international border divides source from impact. Increased pressure on Red River Basin farmers has resulted in an urgent need for effective strategies to reduce nutrient runoff. Previous research has shown that the 4R framework can help to meet load reduction goals in Ohio’s similarly flat Western Lake Erie Basin watershed. We propose to evaluate and amend the 4R Nutrient Stewardship Concept for the shifting cropping systems and cold climate of the Red River Basin. A public-private partnership approach involving partners from the US and Canada is proposed to support the long-term success of 4R Nutrient Stewardship and Certification in the Red River Basin.

Project Goals:

  • Evaluate the dual water quality and agronomic benefits of 4R Nutrient Stewardship across the Red River Basin.
  • Improve performance of the Minnesota Phosphorus Loss Risk Index for the Great Plains Region.
  • Develop outreach programming and resources to demonstrate research findings and to engage with stakeholders to support the 4R Certification Program.

Project Results:

  • No preliminary results

Annual Reports

Minimizing Phosphorus Loss with 4R Stewardship and Cover Crops

Crops: Corn for grain Corn for silage Soybeans
4R Practices: Time Place

Minimizing Phosphorus Loss with 4R Nutrient Stewardship and Cover Crops

Lead Researcher:

Dr. Nathan Nelson

Professor

Kansas State University

Start Date: 2014

End Date: 2019

Collaborating scientists and universities

  • Dr. Kraig L Roozeboom, Kansas State University
  • Dr. Peter Tomlinson, Kansas State University
  • Dr. Phil L. Barnes, Kansas State University
  • Dr. Jeffery R. Williams, Kansas State University
  • Dr. Gerard J. Kluitenberg, Kansas State University

Project Summary

Fertilizer timing and placement can have large impacts on P loss. Currently recommended BMPs have focused on sub‐surface fertilizer placement as the recommended method for reducing P loss. In contrast, economic and farm management factors may encourage producers to use surface‐broadcast P applications in the fall. Weather patterns typical of the Great Plains indicate that a shift to fall applications may also reduce P loss from surface applied P fertilizer compared to spring surface applications. We need field-scale data comparing P loss from fall surface applied P fertilizer to sub‐surface spring‐applied P fertilizer so we can make accurate recommendations for the right timing and placement combinations to minimize P loss.

Furthermore, cover crop use may protect against potential increased P loss associated with fall surface‐applied fertilizers, thereby allowing producers wider flexibility in fertilizer management while maintaining minimal P loss. However, we need more information about the effects of cover crops on P loss and the interaction between cover crops and P fertilizer management. Because cover crops can also impact crop yields, we need comprehensive analysis that includes cover crop and fertilizer management impact on multiple agronomic, environmental, and economic factors, including grain yield, N uptake and use, and P uptake and use, input costs, gross return, net return, N and P loss, sediment loss, and runoff volume. Producers and fertilizer dealers recognize the value in this information.

Project Goals:

  • Determine the agronomic, environmental, and economic impacts of fall surface‐applied P fertilizer compared to currently recommended BMPs for P fertilizer (spring injected P) and no P fertilizer application in corn‐soybean rotations.
  • Determine the agronomic, environmental, and economic effects of winter cover crops in corn‐soybean rotations.
  • Determine the interaction of fertilizer management and cover crop use on agronomic, environmental, and economic measures in corn‐soybean rotations.

Project Results:

  • Spring subsurface placement of P fertilizer maintains lower dissolved P concentrations in runoff water compared to fall broadcast fertilizer application and resulted in lower total P concentrations.
  • Changing P fertilizer management, transitioning from surface broadcast to sub-surface placement, was the most economical methods of reducing P loss.
  • Cover crops in a no-till corn-soybean rotation reduce annual sediment loss by 60 to 70%.
  • Cover crops increased annual average dissolved and total P losses by 28%, varying greatly by runoff year.

Annual Reports

2014

2015

2016

2017

2020

Publications

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizer in Corn Systems in the Midwest

Crops: Corn for grain Corn for silage
4R Practices: Metadata Project

Meta-analysis of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers in Corn Systems in the Midwest

Lead Researcher:

Dr. Rachel Cook

Assistant Professor

North Carolina State University

Start Date: 2014

End Date: 2015

Matching Funds

  • Dow AgroSciences

Project Summary

The 4R approach to nutrient stewardship has helped develop a better context for driving best management practices in production agriculture. As the agricultural community becomes more involved in exploring the three aspects of sustainability, including the economic, social, and environmental triple bottom line, the 4Rs (right source, right rate, right time, and right place) provide a framework for better management of fertilizer applications.

The exceedingly large number of possible combinations of source, rate, time, and place, even within one cropping system, can make it difficult to compare results from studies located in different regions, with different climate, soils, and accepted management practices. To prevent needless duplication of study parameters and suggest future study directions, the soil fertility and fertilizer community needs to systematically compile what we know in order to move forward in the most efficient manner possible.

Project Goals:

  • Compile a database that will characterize environmental variables (latitude and longitude, precipitation, soil texture, soil organic matter, and plot size).
  • Meta-analysis will re-evaluate the current literature on nitrapyrin, and expand the analysis to include other nitrification inhibitors, urease inhibitors, and controlled release fertilizers will create a more useful and broader-scoped analysis of the environmental and agronomic benefits of these management practices in Midwestern corn production.

Project Results:

  • Application timing and nitrogen rate had a greater effect than nitrogen source with enhanced efficiency properties for management and environmental factors for this specific meta-analysis.
  • A need for an additional assessment that coverages greater regions and specific systems that are susceptible to losses is clear.
  • Nitrate leaching and water-quality information reported with measures of variability are the biggest information gap at this time for both tile-drained and non-tile-drained systems.

Annual Reports

2014

2015

A ‘Manage’ ed approach for 4R nutrient stewardship on drained land

Crops: Canola Corn for grain Corn for silage Cotton Hay Potato Rice Ryegrass Sorghum Soybeans Sugar beets Sugarcane Winter wheat Wheat
4R Practices: Metadata Project

A “MANAGE”ed Approach to 4R Nutrient Stewardship on Drained Land

Lead Researcher:

Dr. Laura Christianson

Assistant Professor

University of Illinois

Collaborating scientists and universities

  • Dr. R. Daren Harmel, USDA-ARS

Start Date: 2014

End Date: 2015

Matching Funds

  • Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Resource Board

Project Summary

As agriculture in the 21st century is faced with increasing pressure to reduce negative environmental impacts while continuing to efficiently produce food, fiber, and fuel, it becomes ever more important to reflect upon more than half a century of drainage water quality research to identify future paths towards increased sustainability. This work provided a quantitative review of the water quality and crop yield impacts of artificially drained agronomic systems across North America by compiling data from drainage nutrient studies into the “Measured Annual Nutrient loads from Agricultural Environments” (MANAGE) database. Of the nearly 400 studies reviewed, 91 individual journal publications and 1279 site-years were included in the new MANAGE Drain Load table with data from 1961 to 2012.

Project Goals:

  • The MANAGE Drain Load database: Review and compilation of more than fifty years of drainage nutrient studies.
  • 4Rs water quality impacts: A review and synthesis of forty years of drainage nitrogen losses.
  • A quantitative review and synthesis of fifty years of drainage phosphorus losses.

Project Results:

  • Increasing nitrogen application rates both improved crop yields and increased dissolved nitrogen loads in drainage. “Fine-tuning” these rates is clearly important from economic and environmental standpoints, but it would be short-sighted and unrealistic to focus solely on this practice.
  • The order of magnitude difference between agronomic phosphorus application rates and phosphorus loadings that can cause ecological damage presents a serious environmental challenge, especially compared to nitrogen. Across the literature, generally less than 2% of applied phosphorus was lost in drainage in a given site year.
  • Practices such as applying at planting or side-dressing had lowest median nitrogen losses (not significant).
  • Adherence to 4Rs strategies is vital regardless of the nutrient source, and accurate implementation of the 4Rs approach will require site-specific knowledge.

Annual Reports

2015

Publications